Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

Background. Researchers acknowledge the need to share study results with the patients and their communities, but this is not done consistently due to a plethora of barriers, including a paucity of data to guide best practice approaches in different populations. Methods. This study was nested within a large multi-centre randomized controlled trial of antimalaria treatment. Data on dissemination preferences were collected at the third month follow-up visit using a short questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and subsequently fed into an iterative process with key stakeholders, to develop suitable strategies for result dissemination. Results. A total of 960 patients were enrolled in the trial, of whom 84.0% participated in the nested survey. A total of 601 (74.6%) participants indicated interest in receiving trial results. There was significant heterogeneity by study country, with 33.3% (58/174) of patients indicating being interested in Cambodia, 100% (334/334) in Ethiopia, 97.7% (209/214) in Pakistan, but none (0/85) in Indonesia. The preferred method of dissemination varied by site, with community meetings favoured in Ethiopia (79.0%, 264/334) and individualised communication such as a letter (27.6%, 16/58) or phone calls (37.9%, 22/58) in Cambodia. Dissemination strategies were designed with key stakeholders and based on patient preferences but required adaptation to accommodate local logistical challenges. Conclusion. The varying preferences observed across different sites underscore that a onesize- fits-all approach is inadequate. Strategies can be tailored to patient preference but require adaptation to accommodate logistical challenges.

Original publication

DOI

10.1017/cts.2025.56

Type

Journal

Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Publication Date

01/01/2025