Cookies on this website

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you click 'Accept all cookies' we'll assume that you are happy to receive all cookies and you won't see this message again. If you click 'Reject all non-essential cookies' only necessary cookies providing core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility will be enabled. Click 'Find out more' for information on how to change your cookie settings.

In situ measurements have great importance since in many scientific fields certain samples cannot be moved because of diverse reasons (excessive dimensions or weight, security, logistics etc.). In heritage science, this is a crucial requirement due to the high value of art objects, requiring non-invasive and in situ analyses. Therefore, it is important to have analytical methods capable of providing relevant information also outside laboratory environments. Such measurements face multiple challenges: for example, interference from ambient light or formation of artefacts due to undesired motions of the instruments. In Raman spectroscopy, a number of solutions have been demonstrated to mitigate these effects. For instance, Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS) has proven efficient in removing the fluorescence of the sample and ambient light interference, and a charge-shifting detection approach was shown to be valuable in dealing with varying ambient light. In this study, we provide a comparison of conventional Raman spectroscopy, Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS), charge-shifting detection technology and a combined SERDS and charge-shifting approach, in order to evaluate their effectiveness in mitigating fast evolving interfering backgrounds (e.g., varying ambient light). Further investigations were also carried out into the potential of coupling of these methods with Spatially Offset Raman Spectroscopy (SORS) to facilitate more effective non-invasive investigations of subsurface sample components (e.g. paint layers). The study was carried out using samples mimicking cultural heritage materials with different degrees of complexity and in the presence of fluorescence and ambient light interference. The results are, nevertheless, applicable more generally to other areas such as forensics or biomedical fields, where both dynamic and static interferences can hinder measurements.

Original publication

DOI

10.1039/d4an01280a

Type

Journal

The Analyst

Publication Date

02/2025

Addresses

Institute of Heritage Science, National Research Council (CNR-ISPC), Via Cozzi 53, 20125, Milan, Italy. alberto.lux@mail.polimi.it.